Western Civilization. History and Background of Evolution Research Paper

Western Civilization. History and Background of Evolution - Research Paper Example Darwin always had an interest in nature from his early childhood years. In the years between 1823 and 1913, Russell Wallace too discovered this idea of natural choice (Kemp, p.12). Darwin’s book â€Å"The origin of species† introduced the scientific theory that stated that the people did evolve through the ages through a process of natural choice. Background of evolution In the year 1859, Charles Darwin wrote a book with the title ‘The Origin of Species’. In this book, the author stated that all the living things in the universe live in a complex web of survival where all the things have connections to one another. The source also states that hereditary disparities begin occurring in all the living creatures and this make all the species to begin reproducing in extra ordinary ways. The book describes the key to evolution as the ability to make natural choices implying that the fittest will survive through any situation. In the year 1871, Charles Darwin wrot e a book on the origin of human nature according to the issue of sex. The author attributed the way man looks and acts to the appearance and actions of chimpanzees. He says that if man looks and acts like chimpanzees then he must have come from where they live. In the year 1863, Thomas Huxley came up with evidence as to the segment of man in the natural world (Kemp, p.43). He claims that the chimpanzees and man are close and act similarly thereby implying that they come from the same ancestors. Another author by the name of Ernest Hagkel came up with the missing connection theory that suggests that man must have come from something. In the year 1924 Dr. Raymond Dart, an Australian from the University of Oxford went to South Africa to become a teacher. He described the evolution process as consisting of five stages. This are the stages one to five of the evolution process. The first stage analyses the characteristics of the fossil and dates it to be as old as 2.5 million to six milli on years old. The killer ape theory of Darwin however suggests that apes only grow to four feet and do not live past the age of four years. In an effort to verify this claims, Louis and Mary Leakey carried out archaeological discoveries in Tanzania in the year 1931. They managed to find a complete skull of a sixteen year old at The Old Dubi George. Stage two of the evolution process states man is to live for a period of twenty five years and grow to five feet tall with a brain capacity greater than 700CC. They referred to this creature as the homo habilis since they had 100 teeth and a big toe. The creatures features were almost similar to the man of today. Stage three of the evolution process makes the discovery of a creature they call Java with a brain capacity of 1,000CC, is six feet tall and can live up to 35 years of age (Kemp, p.76). It has the ability to stand straight and can also speak. They can also build better tools, start fires and raise families. The name that the crea ture gets is the name homo erectus. Stage four describes the discovery of a creature living in the Neanderthal valley in Germany and France. It has a brain capacity of 1,500 CC, teeth that are identical to those of man and stands at five feet tall. They adapt to their harsh environments by growing body hairs and having thicker bones. Stage five of this process dates back to the period between 1868 and 1928 and states that the man did live about seventeen million years ago. They described the species as having a brain similar to that of the modern man, wearing clothes and building settlements (Kemp, p.94). 2) History of Ancient Egypt from 10,000 BC to the end of the 2nd intermediate period The pre historic Egypt had a cover of ice measuring two blocks in the northern and central areas. The ice did melt down by the year

FLSA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

FLSA - Essay Example me spent by workers after threshold (40) hours in a work-week is "FLSA overtime." This is to be noted here that few jobs may use the word "overtime" otherwise, as for example to describe "extra time worked after the employees normal schedule" or "time worked beyond normal hours in a day†. An organization may pay employees on whatsoever it wishes, keeping in mind that actual pay does not fall below the least standards defined by the FLSA. It is, therefore, allowed for an employer to apply the word "overtime" to mean something else from the actual definition of "overtime" prescribed by FLSA. However, that does not alter the meaning of the word â€Å"overtime† for FLSA principles, and it is important to keep the meaning of "overtime" to its legal definition in deciding the FLSA rights of employees. "Time worked after of normal working schedule" may not equate "time worked after threshold time (40 hours in a work-week)." Only the second is "overtime" under the FLSA rules, an d the FLSA governs only pay due for the overtime as per FLSA (McCarty, 2010). According to the Unites States Department of Labor (DOL), the time spend by employees performing duties that are related to job is termed as â€Å"work –time† and considered as working hours and must be paid, except attendance is beyond regular working hours. Important FLSA regulations on above points are at â€Å"29 CFR 785.11, 785.12, and 785.13†. Note as per FALSA rules all the activities that not benefitting the employer during the overtime should not be considered to pay. The reason for which I feel that Mr. Mike Murphy does not have a right to FLSA claim, because during his job he manages to train himself and stay in shape while he is on duty so that he can proceed to perform the required physical test in order to pursue his duties as a member of SWAT team. The extra overtime that was shown on his time card was outside of and in addition to the allotted time specified by the company, which was not the